.
Feedback

Community Dialogue on Discipline Thursday

Meetings across Fairfax County continue years-long conversations on Student Rights and Responsibilities.

Four months after the Fairfax County School Board named members to a committee tasked with reviewing the system's student rights and responsibilities handbook, the group is seeking input from residents on what changes it should consider moving forward.

The Ad Hoc Community Committee on Student Rights and Responsibilities (SR&R), created by the board Sept. 20, has traveled across the county this week and will continue to do so through Feb. 23, seeking parent, student and community member feedback on how to improve Fairfax County Public Schools' disciplinary procedures.

The meeting closest to Vienna will be held Thursday at McLean High School.

The 40-member group — which includes representatives appointed by the county's three major teachers unions, high school and middle school principal associations, as well as the county's associations for school social workers and psychologists — has met regularly since Oct. 24.

It's chaired by Steve Stuban of Fairfax, whose son's suicide sparked a push for disciplinary reform two years ago.

"I'm exceptionally proud of [members'] dedication to this effort, not merely in the number of hours spent in our proceedings but their willingness to listen to differing viewpoints," Stuban told Patch this week.

Stuban said while input from the committee — more than half of whose members were appointed by each of the school board's 12 members — has been valuable, "the voice of the community is vital to ensure that the recommendations we advance to the School Board are in keeping with the community's values."

The meetings held this month will include an outline of the committee's preliminary recommendations to the school board, along with a time for feedback on those plans and current practices. 

Last fall, board member Sandy Evans (Mason) said she looked forward to group's findings, particularly on parental notification, a sticking point for the board and community through several other rounds of system changes, and support for students who have been suspended.

At the time, Megan McLaughlin (Braddock) said she hoped the committee will make a real effort to look toward surrounding jurisdictions — specifically, Arlington and Montgomery Counties and the Maryland Board of Education — "that have made tremendous strides in looking at discipline reform."

Stuban said "if you believe as we do that every student matters, we ask that you attend one of the Dialogues and ensure that your voice is heard."

Remaining meetings include:

  • McLean: 7 to 9 p.m. Thursday in the McLean High School Cafeteria
  • Falls Church: 1 to 3 p.m. Feb. 23 in Falls Church High School's Little Theater

Spanish and Korean interpreters will be available at each meeting, the system says.

Going? Registration isn't required, but will help organizers plan meetings. Register here.

Can't make it? Send feedback to Community_Dialogues@fcps.edu or mail comments to: FCPS Office of Intervention and Prevention Services Attn: SR&R 3877 Fairfax Ridge Road, Fairfax, Va, 22030.

See also:

  • Board Names Members to Discipline Committee
  • Board Creates 40-Member Discipline Committee
  • Board Postpones Discipline Committee Creation
  • School Board to Vote on Discipline Committee
  • The Eight School Board Initiatives to Watch in 2012-2013
  • Discipline Policy Changes Stop Short of Parental Notification
  • Board Revisits Discipline Policy

 

Stay in the loop. Subscribe to Reston Patch's free daily newsletter.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Reston Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Stuart Rakoff June 19, 2013 at 12:47 pm
miss the weather summary at top of page
Cynde Jackson Clarke June 18, 2013 at 05:39 pm
Looks fabulous!!
k June 19, 2013 at 08:52 pm
Eh. The responsive design is ok on mobile devices, but it feels really weak on a website. TheRead More "local" photos at the top are low res. It could be tailored a little more like another user said, he missed the little touches like the local weather. An RSS feed of local AP news wouldn't hurt despite the focus of local-only content.
k June 19, 2013 at 08:53 pm
How much individual design is AOL allowing the editors of this site?
Jackie Link June 18, 2013 at 10:17 am
Way to go everyone - Awesome job! Congratulations!!
Eric Cooksey June 18, 2013 at 08:16 pm
What an exciting weekend of softball culminating into a great championship win! So proud of ourRead More Glory ladies!
Kathy Fries June 19, 2013 at 06:19 am
A fun Father's Day Tournament that displayed our girls' softball skills :) Great start to the 2013Read More summer season - Way to go ladies & coaches!
Joe C. June 14, 2013 at 07:03 pm
Molly-you have hit it on the head! We shouldn't be starting down this slippery slope of ruleRead More changing for 1 person.I do not know this individual , but that is not the issue here.
Dilip Kamat June 17, 2013 at 01:51 am
If the RA Board approves this self serving move by another RA Board member then the board membersRead More who do so should be voted out of their roles the next time they run for election.
Mike M June 18, 2013 at 02:41 pm
Mr. Farrell, methinks thou protest too much. What ridicule and derision? It seems that you areRead More fanning the flames and rooting out some sort of scandal that, from my view, doesn't exist. As I understand it, there is a by-law provision that allows a homeowner to ask to be included in the RA. This wasn't something made up to accommodate one person. It was adopted for any single homeowner or cluster to opt in. There is no slippery slope. The rule is not being changed or adjusted for one person. The rule or by-law was in place prior to any of this hand wringing. Next, Ms. Rostant and all the other RA Board members are serving on a volunteer basis. Do any of you critics see some sort of gain to be had in this case? I find the witch hunt nature of some regarding this matter to be dubious if not mean spirited. Its easy to sit back in your easy chair and type away on your computer and deliver your edicts to resign. Get the facts. The lack of civility in some of these posts is repulsive.