.
Feedback

Supervisors Approve Spectrum Redevelopment

Vision for area from New Dominion to Baron Cameron is high-density, mixed-use Reston urban core.

The Fairfax County Board of Supervisors on Tuesday unanimously approved the plans for redevelopment of Reston's Spectrum Center, ensuring that the Reston of the future will have Reston Town Center-like development from the Dulles Toll Road (and future Metrorail station) to Baron Cameron Avenue.

"This plan coming in gives the community a picture of what the Town Center core will be and subsequent development that will take place," Hunter Mill Supervisor Cathy Hudgins said at the BOS public hearing.  

The plan for the Spectrum includes 774,879 square feet of non-residential use; 1,422 multifamily residential units (with 12 percent set aside for affordable housing) in seven new residential buildings; 38 percent open space; underground and structure parking; LEED certifications; two new east-west streets and expanded bike trails and pedestrian access.

The development will be divided this way:

Land Bay A (where Best Buy and the soon-to-be closed Barnes & Noble are located) is planned for 546 dwelling units, 255 hotel rooms, 172,000 square feet of office, and 62,500 square feet of retail uses.

Land Bay B (where PetSmart and On the Border are located) is planned for 643 dwelling units, 270 hotel rooms, and 48,650 square feet of retail uses.

Land Bay C (where Harris Teeter is located) is planned for 237 residential units and 134,896 square feet of retail and bank uses. Only Harris Teeter will remain - and expand into the current Office Depot space - in the redevelopment.

Additionally, Land Bay B will wrap around the planned 23-story office tower at Bowman Towne Drive and Reston Parkway. That building, which will contain retail and 18 stories of offices, was approved by the supervisors in September.

There were no citizen speakers in the public comment period, but land use attorney Mark Looney, representing Spectrum owner Lerner Enterprises, offered some history of the parcel.

The land was rezoned as part of the Reston Town Center commercial district in the 1980s. When it opened as a strip-mall retail in the mid-1990s, it actually was underdeveloped, said Looney.

"It was underdevelopment in respect to the property zoning," said Looney. "Reston Town Center was intended to be a grand downtown. This was developed in transition [due to the economy of the early 1990s]. In the interim, it be came a big box-development."

The redevelopment of the Spectrum has been in the works for years, but the timing was not right to move forward until now, said Looney. Additionally, the first Metro Silver Line station is slated to open at Wiehle Avenue in December 2013 and the Reston Parkway Station is scheduled to open in about six years.

The Spectrum is located just over a half-mile from the planned Reston Parkway Station, making it a proper place for transit-oriented development, Hudgins said.

The application was reactivated last year, and was recommended for approval by the county planning commission in November.

Looney said the redevelopment is "the vision for what the property was always intended to be," adding that many buildings will be oriented toward Fountain Drive -  which will become a central boulevard lined with shops and outdoor cafes - rather than oriented towards parking lots.

To see the entire staff report on the Spectrum, click here.

 

Keep up with all Reston development news by subscribing to Reston Patch's free daily newsletter.

Jim Hubbard January 13, 2013 at 04:13 pm
As several folks have noted, more development is a certainty for central Reston. It is also a certainty that the development will bring still more cars to central Reston. The developers and the County insist that denser development, "transit oriented development," will somehow alleviate congestion. The best research suggests, however, that denser development may bring as many cars as "sprawl." If denser development does mean fewer cars, it means, at best, that rather than one car for every new adult inhabitant, there are three cars for every four new inhabitants. Still a big increase. Given that the roads in central Reston are already over-crowded, the community faces a serious problem.
Any effort to reduce the scale of new development is worthwhile, but even under the best circumstances, we will see many more people and cars in central Reston. The only real solution is get people out of their cars and into public transportation. Once the Silver Line opens, Reston needs frequent feeder bus service to the new station. And, unlike the County's apparent plan, Reston needs bus service to extend well beyond Reston's borders -- to serve the people headed to the Silver Line from the south and west as well as the people headed to jobs in Reston. To be specific, one goal needs to be to get as many people who now drive north on West Ox/Reston Parkway each morning out of their cars and into buses.
Lisa Roberts January 13, 2013 at 10:25 pm
People don't want to ride on buses then get on a metro and take the same amount of time to get to work as if you were driving in the comfort of your own car. If people did then no one would drive to DC for work. Build all the roads and metro you want what we have is a population problem.
BBurns January 13, 2013 at 10:56 pm
Ditto. Or public transportation can take more time. I don't think most people who live in the suburbs have the city mentality of jumping on a bus or subway car. That's not a criticism, just a fact.
Fairfax County/the superivors don't care that Reston is a planned community. They will overbuild and over populate. Not everywhere in the country is like this. Some communities do say no to more growth.
Java Master January 13, 2013 at 11:54 pm
How do you propose to pay for any sort of expansive (or is it just "expensive"?)commuter/feeder bus service thru Reston and its environs? Planning and development orthodoxy suggests that vastly increased residential densities are required to support transit of any kind...is there a market for circulating, feeder bus service? Will all be compelled to pay higher taxes plus user fees to support a bus system? The Tysons Corner area is flirting with this idea, and its experience there will be instructive.
Andy R. January 14, 2013 at 12:37 am
Growth may be here to stay but it can be shaped to be more residential friendly. However, Hudgins is so pro development that all we are left with are more traffic, taller buildings an outdated library and no bookstore for 60,000 people. No one can convince me she is doing a good job.
Tee Powell January 14, 2013 at 12:53 am
The board of supervisors will approve anything as long as it's not in their backyard.
Jim Hubbard January 14, 2013 at 03:01 pm
Many suburbanites don't choose to ride buses. Buses cost money. Operating buses in areas of low density development is more expensive. All true, but irrelevant.
An intersection like Reston Parkway and Sunset Hills can handle only so many cars in an hour. Traffic at that intersection and others in central Reston is rapidly approaching capacity, without any new construction. Cars burn gasoline, a oil-based product. Oil is a limited, non-renewable commodity. Cars produce air pollution. The Washington area already exceeds EPA's standard for clean air. The decision to expand public transportation, in order to get cars off the roads, conserve oil and improve air quality, is only a matter of "when." Do you want to do it in a planned thoughtful way or do you want to do it under crisis conditions? (For example, when central Reston reaches gridlock or when the Washington area governments are forced to curb air pollution.) Yes, public transportation is not a "free lunch." We will need to subsidize it with tax dollars (just as we subsidize car travel with road construction and maintenance expenditures.) Yes, people will have to change their traveling habits. Driving downtown will, in the foreseeable future, be either impossible or very expensive. (See London's congestion charging scheme and similar efforts elsewhere in Europe.) But European cities have also demonstrated that public transportation and a high quality of life are clearly compatible.
BBurns January 14, 2013 at 03:05 pm
Tee, or even if it is.
Kathy January 14, 2013 at 06:04 pm
Without four or five new bridges across the Dulles Toll Road to accommodate the proposed development along the corridor, the buses will be stuck in traffic with the rest of us.
Kathy Kaplan
Ana Hamdi January 15, 2013 at 02:06 am
Ever been behind the buses when the stop and go. That black smoke that comes out of the exhaust? Smells real good. You cannot force people on buses. The people that take buses are people that do not drive, people with no transportation or people who have low income. All the roads in NVA are at capacity. Public transportation does not reduce traffic if it did there would be no traffic in cities. Perhaps if all the tree huggers would take the public transportation then there would be less cars on the road, however that won't happen because they are hypocrites.
Leanne Millikan January 15, 2013 at 02:34 am
Let's force all the liberals on public transit. They can all be crammed in a nice hot bus together or a smelly metro car. Then they can feel like their in Europe.
Java Master January 15, 2013 at 03:01 am
Social engineering in the guise of transportation planning--with deeply subsidized public transit as the goal--this is your solution? Is there no limit to the raiding of the public purse by special interests such as these? The substantial financial costs of mass transit, particularly in suburban areas, is hardly "irrelevant". Demonstrate to me how buses will reduce suburban gridlock under any reasonable scenario. I'm not trying to be obsteptrous here, but I challenge you and other transportaion advocates to make your case in more concrete terms. Few suburban residents see a future without private automobiles, either, you will have to pry their cars keys "from their cold dead hands!"
Kathy January 15, 2013 at 03:21 am
Oh Java Master,
They won't be prying the cars out of our cold dead hands. What they are going to do is to restrict parking by removing parking spaces. It's a New Urbanist technique. No parking spaces at the grocery store. Hudgins will expect us to pay a service to deliver our groceries to our homes. I kid you not. Reston is to be "car-free." Don't you guys ever read the RA magazine? Kathy Kaplan
Virginia Harlow January 15, 2013 at 01:36 pm
Kathy, as evidence you are right, notice that at least two roads that used to be 4 lanes are not messed up, made single lane with bike lanes. They aren't in places where folks really ride very often, I expect. Too many hills. But it's the plan, man! Get all the 40 and 50 year olds out there riding in their spandex with helmets to their jobs in those bike lanes instead! Cut parking places to practically nothing, and charge a bundle for that parking. I can assure you, the "planners" have great ideas for your future!
Jim Hubbard January 15, 2013 at 02:02 pm
Let's be concrete. The intersection at Reston Parkway and Sunset Hills is approaching gridlock. What do you do? The "people will never change" school says: do nothing. Others say build more crossings over the Toll Road. That might help, but who's going to pay for these crossings? And how soon are they going to be built? (You will remember that the County and the Commonwealth contend they have no money for transportation improvements.) And how does that relieve the congestion on Reston Parkway before you get to Sunset Hills?
In the same space that two or three cars occupy (with a total of three occupants in many cases), a bus can carry 50-60 people. Given the limited nature of the central Reston road network, bus lanes would be necessary. (You will note that the County has already begun hinting that this is the case.) Every full bus means up to twenty cars off the road. Sounds like progress to me. Are the suburbs ideal for bus transportation? No they are not. In many cases, we will need to develop new services using smaller buses and on-demand services (you schedule a pick-up in advance) similar to those found in some rural areas in Europe. Nevertheless, we have little choice. The roads can't accommodate more traffic, we are running out of oil and we can't continue polluting the atmosphere.
Ray Wedell January 15, 2013 at 02:05 pm
There is much truth to what you are saying, Virginia.
Ray Wedell January 15, 2013 at 02:09 pm
Ana,
Environmental comments aside in this debate, people are not going to go to the Reston Town Center by bus. Period. The subway, five years out (maybe) and more than 1/2 mile from Spectrum is going to do almost nothing to alleviate traffic. We all know this. So when will we hear a common sense solution to an obvious issue.... plans need to be made NOW to handle the many additional cars which will be cascading on us, assuming the Spectrum plan is a success?
Ray Wedell January 15, 2013 at 02:12 pm
Kathy,
The idea of making Reston "car free" is so ludicrous. We all know it. The handful of nirvana-creators who think we will add all this office space, restaurants, and residential housing and people will gladly access by foot or bicycle, need to be placed on the back burner. People who have common sense and can deal with the upcoming traffic issues, please step forward.
Ray Wedell January 15, 2013 at 02:13 pm
Ever been in a traffic jam which has buses in the jam? Traffic could conceivably be worse with buses.
Ray Wedell January 15, 2013 at 02:15 pm
Tee.... this is a key point. Unless your own Supervisor stands up strongly to oppose something, you have no shot at defeating the interests which promise the County "added tax revenues." We do not have a person in charge of our district who has this in her DNA.
Ray Wedell January 15, 2013 at 02:20 pm
Andy.... I feel your pain. I am not certain if she is "pro development" or simply does not have the strength and stubbornness to stand up for what is right. Developer interests are very powerful in promising "added tax revenue" which most Supervisors in other districts will seize as a positive. It takes an intelligent, stubbornly strong advocate to overcome this. Ms Hudgins is NOT that type of personality. Either way, the end result is a "pro development" appeasement coming from this district, and developers know it....... why else would they even come to the table at this time with such an outrageous proposition as the golf course re-zoning? They want to fight that fight while they have a soft advocate in place as our Supervisor. Sorry, did I say something that was not true?
Ray Wedell January 15, 2013 at 02:22 pm
Lisa...Bingo! Any plan which forces people to get on buses and subways to make the plan work is a failed plan.
Ray Wedell January 15, 2013 at 02:31 pm
Somehow, I don't think the Reston Metro subway hub is going to look like the Pentagon Station. So all of the talk of massive feeder bus systems and huge bus services is ludicrous. I am not sure I have the answer. Given the current configuration of the area, can we improve surface transportation roads (as we must do to make this work) to accommodate this? And if not, have we killed the goose which laid the golden egg by driving people away from the RTC because of difficult access? And what will Reston look like during the construction phase...Route 7 in Tyson's anyone? Given all this, why would any company pay premium dollars for office space in the new Spectrum Center? How many people who currently enjoy breezing in and out of the Town enter go somewhere else instead? There are other options. Someone had better stop "kicking the can down the road" in discussing how we accommodate the growth expected from the Spectrum project.
Ray Wedell January 15, 2013 at 02:32 pm
Amen.
Ray Wedell January 15, 2013 at 02:47 pm
This is the type of either/or, binary option commentary which has destroyed common sense discussion of relevent issues in America today. Accuse the people who are not on your side of being "a tree hugger" or "a tea party advocate" or some other denigrating comment to make your own case. Denigrate the opposition!
Ann, I liked your commentary and there is immense truth in it. The fact that County officials act offended by your well thought comments tells me that you hit an exposed nerve. Good job. The options are NOT, I repeat are NOT: 1)either accept Spectrum's plan and any growth approved, i.e., winked at, by the County OR accept urban sprawl. Or.. 2) You either "change with the times", i.e. accept whatever changes are tossed at you as inevitable (especially since your County bureaucracy has blessed it as okay) OR be a cave person who hides in the corner and rejects all growth. Susan, I am neither of the above. Stop typecasting people into the narrowness of one of two camps. Anyone want to have a REAL debate on this issue, a thorough debate on how this should all work for the good of the community? Then bring it on. But guess what....this is NOT what County officials nor developers want. They want to make all the decisions, hold minimally-advertised "public hearings" on weekday afternoons to satisfy a legal requirement, then just plow forward with what they want to do to assure their own well being. Public opinion, to them, is a nuisance, and maybe a threat.
Ray Wedell January 15, 2013 at 02:50 pm
Stephen....amen.
Virginia Harlow January 15, 2013 at 03:14 pm
Avoid RTC??? Many people are already avoiding downtown. Personally, I shop almost anywhere but. The annoyance of highrise parking now is enough to keep me away. What till it costs money, too! The metro is very likely going to take local folks into the DC or Tysons areas, and when will it bring the same amount of people back? From what I've read by democratsagainstunagenda21.com it seems that the development dollars are likely to come from state or local "redevelopment" funds with agreements that the develops don't have to pay taxes for 10 years, or something like that. So, the developers get rich on the local folk. It's all local, folks. I don't object to a bit of sane development but only when the developers can actually profit and pay taxes. This plan is HUGE. Not little by little as needed at all. The toll on the toll road has gone up again. In what way, and how much more will taxpayers be hit for all this? I'm sure it will cost us all, while some profit.
While we spandex ourselves, helmet up, and pump, pump up and down and eat tofu. Yucht. The future doesn't look so good to me. Glad I'm old already.
Terry Maynard January 15, 2013 at 03:15 pm
Let me suggest that those of you interested in Restonians' future mobility take a look at the comprehensive report put together by RCA's Reston 2020 Transportation Work Group nearly three years ago for the Reston TF. In short, it highlights the need for all kinds of transportation improvements--roads and parking, bus transit, bicycling, & pedestrian--to keep Reston a livable place. And, sorry folks, there is no one "silver bullet" solution; it will take all of them.
The 53-page report is available here: http://www.scribd.com/doc/32716465/Reston-Transportation-Meeting-the-Needs-of-a-21st-Century-Planned-Community-Transportation-Work-Group-RCA-Reston-2020-Committee-June-1-2010
BBurns January 15, 2013 at 03:29 pm
If alone, I also avoid RTC and generally head to Dulles Town Center. Easy parking. With a semi-bad knee, and dislike of parking garages, it's no contest.
Our superivisor won't fight for Reston as a planned community. It's treated like Any Suburbs, VA. And that's a crime. We moved from Bethesda to Reston partly because of the beyond insane traffic. Right now Reston is magnificent compared to Bethesda - even at the worst intersections. But with Fairfax County powers that be at the helm, Reston will catch up.
Lisa Roberts January 15, 2013 at 09:00 pm
During the week on my day off I use to go to the Reston Town Center to shop. Now I avoid the RTC during the week. The parking stinks now. I got tired of driving around looking for parking. The only parking left is in one of the garages on the very top level and that is almost full. I just go to Dulles Town Center or Tysons. Always plenty of parking. However with the developers eating up all the space in Tysons the parking will probably go to.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Reston Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Stuart Rakoff June 19, 2013 at 12:47 pm
miss the weather summary at top of page
Cynde Jackson Clarke June 18, 2013 at 05:39 pm
Looks fabulous!!
k June 19, 2013 at 08:52 pm
Eh. The responsive design is ok on mobile devices, but it feels really weak on a website. TheRead More "local" photos at the top are low res. It could be tailored a little more like another user said, he missed the little touches like the local weather. An RSS feed of local AP news wouldn't hurt despite the focus of local-only content.
k June 19, 2013 at 08:53 pm
How much individual design is AOL allowing the editors of this site?
Jackie Link June 18, 2013 at 10:17 am
Way to go everyone - Awesome job! Congratulations!!
Eric Cooksey June 18, 2013 at 08:16 pm
What an exciting weekend of softball culminating into a great championship win! So proud of ourRead More Glory ladies!
Kathy Fries June 19, 2013 at 06:19 am
A fun Father's Day Tournament that displayed our girls' softball skills :) Great start to the 2013Read More summer season - Way to go ladies & coaches!
Joe C. June 14, 2013 at 07:03 pm
Molly-you have hit it on the head! We shouldn't be starting down this slippery slope of ruleRead More changing for 1 person.I do not know this individual , but that is not the issue here.
Dilip Kamat June 17, 2013 at 01:51 am
If the RA Board approves this self serving move by another RA Board member then the board membersRead More who do so should be voted out of their roles the next time they run for election.
Mike M June 18, 2013 at 02:41 pm
Mr. Farrell, methinks thou protest too much. What ridicule and derision? It seems that you areRead More fanning the flames and rooting out some sort of scandal that, from my view, doesn't exist. As I understand it, there is a by-law provision that allows a homeowner to ask to be included in the RA. This wasn't something made up to accommodate one person. It was adopted for any single homeowner or cluster to opt in. There is no slippery slope. The rule is not being changed or adjusted for one person. The rule or by-law was in place prior to any of this hand wringing. Next, Ms. Rostant and all the other RA Board members are serving on a volunteer basis. Do any of you critics see some sort of gain to be had in this case? I find the witch hunt nature of some regarding this matter to be dubious if not mean spirited. Its easy to sit back in your easy chair and type away on your computer and deliver your edicts to resign. Get the facts. The lack of civility in some of these posts is repulsive.