Fairfax Officials Look to Transit's Future

Officials are seeking public comment on the needs for the next 40 years.

While a vision for the next 40 years of Tysons Corner development and transportation has started to take shape, what the rest of Fairfax County will look like — and how residents will travel around and within it — is largely unclear.

Monday night was an early step toward painting part of that picture with the first public input meeting of the county’s 2050 County Transit Network Study. This is an effort by the department of transportation to determine how public transit system expansion plans can best meet the county’s goals for long-term economic growth.

About 50 people attended the three-hour meeting in Fairfax , including Board of Supervisors Chairman Sharon Bulova, Springfield District Supervisor Pat Herrity, Fairfax City Councilman Michael DeMarco and Vienna Mayor Jane Seeman.

Among the options the county could consider in high-demand areas: an extended Metrorail, light- rail lines or street car and high speed-bus routes.

“An objective of the study is to develop an inter-connected rapid transit system network that gets people where they need to go that connects with transit in Arlington, Alexandria, Loudoun and Prince William [counties],” said Tom Burke, a senior transportation planner in the county’s DOT.

The study will also take land-use and right-of-ways into account, so that transit possibilities – and potential Metrorail station locations – aren’t eclipsed by other development.

“When we identify these [transit] corridors, we’ll identify the necessary right-of-way, and as we go through development review over the next several years, we’ll be looking at this plan and asking property owners and developers to accommodate the necessary right of way,” Burke said.

The DOT is just beginning to develop its preliminary goals and objectives for the study, but it’s keeping a focus on affordable, high-occupancy options, as opposed to new roadways.

“One of the challenges in Fairfax County is that … we’ve essentially built out our highway system,” said Dan Hardy of the Renaissance Planning Group. “There are still things under construction, but there are very few new roads that we’re going to be adding to the Fairfax County network.”

That means mixed-use development in highly trafficked areas, or “activity centers,” such as Springfield, Huntington and Tyson’s Corner would play a large part in, according to the presentation Monday night.

“Some people can choose to live and work in the same community and not necessarily get into any kind of vehicle for these daily trips,” Hardy said.
One resident wanted to know how these transit options would be funded when the time came to build them. “If someone wants to ride, they should pay to ride,” he said. “We shouldn’t be subsidizing.”

The DOT will make its recommendations for the 2050 transit study based on the current federal funding processes to see what is feasible.
County resident Rob Whitfield was also concerned about the money.

“Until you change the ground rules on the funding practices for transit, you’re wasting the public’s money with this study because really, you’re assuming that this is a bottomless pit from the taxpayers in Fairfax County,” he said.

Hardy noted that if a project is deemed important but unaffordable, it might be phased over the course of a few years.

After collecting public input this summer, the DOT will refine its study areas and recommendations and present it back to the public in the Fall of 2012, Hardy said. Those suggestions will be weighed and incorporated, and a set of recommendations will be made to the Board of Supervisors, which can then make amendments to the transportation map in the county's Comprehensive Plan.
DOT officials have received about 900 responses to a 25-question online survey, which will be available until Aug. 10.

Another public input meeting will also be held from 6:30 p.m. to 9:30 p.m. Thursday at Hayfield Secondary School.

Lucinda Shannon July 18, 2012 at 01:11 PM
I’m excited to hear that our leaders are planning ahead for our future and including public transit and alternatives to driving in their vision. I can’t wait to take a local bus to the new Silver line metro and read a book while I ride to work. Thanks Chairman Bulova and other supporters of this smart growth strategy.
John Doe July 18, 2012 at 03:52 PM
When will we learn how corrupt and ridiculous our (so called) leaders have become. The fact that we have to fund most of this growth with bonds is evidence enough that we can't afford any of this. We are are "sheeple" for the elite.
The Analyst July 18, 2012 at 06:15 PM
Many people want the county government investigated. It's been under the control of developers for decades. Now the county is using taxpayers to subsidize people with incomes of more than $80,000/year (I think it goes up to $120,000) so they can move into some of the new buildings in Tysons. My own take is this: The area is already over developed. Developers can't move their product either because no one wants to live in that morbid looking over developed pig stye known as Tysons Corner, the demand isn't there, or they're grossly over priced. Enter the county with tax payer money - subsidize people as "poor" that are considered upper middle class as an incentive to buy these properties. In essence, your tax dollars are going right into a developers pocket (likely a wealthy developer). At the very best, this is utter stupidity on behalf of the County government, at the very worst it's flat out crime.
The Analyst July 18, 2012 at 06:28 PM
The more I look, the more I'm inclined to agree with the "over development" crowd on this site (see my response about the county using taxpayer money as an incentive for people to move to Tyson's Corner in response to "John Doe" below). I just don't see these buildings filling up. I think the assumptions of population, business, and government growth are likely extremely off base. If the county needs to subsidize residents with upper middle class incomes to get them to move into an area, I think it's because the demand simply isn't there. - as in the building would, like so many others, be sitting there empty. One has to seriously question the projected growth. What the area needs is a growth in revenue, not necessarily a growth in population. The county/developer alliance doesn't seem to get this and equates population growth with fiscal growth. If this was the case, our taxes today would be peanuts compared to what they were 15 years ago. They're not - they've skyrocketed. This isn't a poor economic model the county is following, it's a pathetic economic model - and I'm afraid all the rail and other expenses that need to be paid will not have a source of credible revenue.
Steve jones July 24, 2012 at 02:22 AM
I think people are having trouble grasping the "affordable housing" in Tysons Corner. It is not being subsidized, but rather a provision required by the developers. This is a common practice which places the fiscal responsibility on developers instead of taxpayers. This sort of debunks the whole county subsidizing affordable housing and being in developers' pockets.argument. Furthermore housing diversity is essential for economic viability in communities. It has been examined in numerous studies. Also the 80k to 120k is not for individuals, but households. The affordable housing level is set by hud on a regional level.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »