Fairfax Budget: Higher Taxes, Service Cuts

No employee pay increases in Fiscal Year 2014 spending plan, which would increase average household taxes by $262 and give Fairfax County Public Schools $62 million less than officials asked for.

Fairfax County Executive Ed Long unveiled his $7 billion FY2014 budget proposal Tuesday, a plan that raises real estate taxes and cuts funds to parks and libraries, among other services.

Long’s advertised budget includes a 2-cent increase in the real estate tax rate from $1.075 per $100 of assessed value to $1.095.

The increase is projected to raise nearly $42 million in count revenue. But when coupled with increases in real estate assessments, the proposed rate would cost the average county household about $262 more in real estate taxes.

Revenue projections are generally flat for the coming year, showing a slight decrease in growth from 2.79 percent in FY2013 to 2.77 percent in FY2014.

With sequestration around the corner, Long said the FY 2014 budget process was particularly difficult. And the effects on the county are still uncertain, he said, adding that he would be “shocked” if legislators agreed to a compromise this week.

Long's presentation showed $25 million in federal revenues, which go mainly to social services aid across the county.

The budget outlines $3.59 billion in general fund spending, a slight decrease of .37 percent from the FY2013 revised budget.

Of that, $1.72 billion is slated to go to Fairfax County Public Schools – approximately $62 million less than the amount the school board was hoping for.

School officials requested a transfer of $1.78 billion, an increase of more than $95 million, or 5.7 percent, over FY 2013. Long’s budget proposal only meets $33.7 million, or an increase of 2 percent.

“I think we made it pretty clear in November that we did not have 5 percent to give the school board,” Long said.

County workers would not receive pay increases under the current budget proposal except for public safety employees, who would get longevity adjustments.

In FY 2013, former County Executive Tony Griffin gave county employees their first compensation increase after three years of pay freezes.

Long’s divisive proposed employee pay program, which was criticized by Supervisors and employee union reps last week, was included in the budget package.

The budget also includes job cuts and funding reductions to parks, libraries and other agencies totaling $20 million.

Of the 91 positions Long has proposed to eliminate, 79 are vacant and 12 are filled. During a press conference after his presentation, Long said he and his staff would work to avoid layoffs and move employees from eliminated positions to other openings.

The proposed budget also adds 11 new public safety positions – nine police officers to help better monitor crime around the four new Silver Line Metro stations expected to open by the end of the year and two animal positions to help staff the newly expanded animal shelter.

Long said he designed the budget to maintain current public safety levels without adding too many new programs.

Supervisor Jeff McKay took issue with devoting police officers solely to one areas of the county affected by the Silver Line.

“I understand there are some needs there,” he said, “but there is a public safety visibility concern throughout the county.”

A $374,000 reduction for library materials would result in fewer titles and copies being available to residents at public libraries. Another $200,000 reduction from the Park Authority’s budget will eliminate funding for maintenance and renovations to tennis and basketball courts.

Supervisor Penny Gross (D-Mason) was not necessarily shocked by the reductions in the budget but was troubled by the cuts to parks and the inclusion of compensation overhauls.

“The Advertised Budget reflects the difficult economic situation we are still experiencing,” Chairman Sharon Bulova said in an emailed statement after the budget presentation. “We are not yet out of the woods as we recover more slowly than we would like from the Great Recession.”

Other supervisors were disappointed with the cuts and tax increases.

“There’s not much to be excited about here,” Supervisor John Foust (D-Dranesville) said.

John Doe February 27, 2013 at 06:29 PM
What a scam! Are these politicians "clowns" or are we the "clown" for putting up this nonsense. "All you need is ignorance and confidence and the success is sure". Mark Twain
The BSD Guy February 27, 2013 at 07:05 PM
Most people recognize the costs of over development - more roads, more schools, more police, more firemen, more tax assessors, more demand on resources...more everything - this is the TRICKLE DOWN ECONOMICS OF OVER DEVELOPMENT. Billionaire elite developers walk away with money in their pockets, leave an area in ruin, with idiots like Kathy Hudgins and other BOS members backing and pushing their very, very special interests all the way at everyone else's expense. The developers sales pitch that if you let development go wild, jobs will just start cropping up like mushrooms after a rainstorm is an UTTER CON and nonsense. This will be the saga of Fairfax County and the Democratic Party of Virginia - more and more and more costs passed down to the rest of us so some billionaire elite developers can make a fast buck. It's time we put an end to special interest politics and get rid of special interest politicians.
Mike M March 01, 2013 at 07:26 PM
They have pretended to be heroic economic engineers forever, while the "invisible hand" in the region has been the largesse of the increasingly indebted Federal Government. It is because of unprecedented expansion of government over the past 10+ years that we avoided the nasty recession that hit the rest of the country in 2007. Now the perfect storm moves in and these emporers will lose their clothes. Already we have the commercial real estate glut. Now we have a fast track trend toward working from home and office "hotelling." And now we have the debt-fieled Federal spending taking an overdue hit! So what do they do? Slash services, raise taxes. Brilliant. When they threaten to do things like make you pay for an ambulance, ask yourself why they are continuing to play i areas like subsidized housing and many,many other frivolous adventures that counties have no business getting invested in. The amazing part to me is how much financial tolerance people have had. I think a good dose of unemployment will wake people up.
The BSD Guy March 01, 2013 at 07:46 PM
...and forget not the fact that people with incomes in the $80,000 to $120,000 level are qualifying for taxpayer relief so developers can apparently unload units that I assume no one really wanted in the first place. This is something residents are funding. .....I think Ms. Hudgins calls it "low income workforce housing." One way or another, developers can find a way to reach into everyone else's pockets and take all they can.
Mike M March 01, 2013 at 07:50 PM
Happy Sequestration Day!


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »