.
Feedback

On Affordable Health Care

Understanding the Affordable Care Act -- who it has already helped, why it's the right thing to do, and how it will save the state money.

A friend of mine of moderate political persuasion said to me recently that while he felt that details of managing the federal Affordable Health Care Act were issues of governance that should continue to be debated and improved, he also felt that passage of the Act was a moral issue that should not be reversed. 

As a New York Times editorial stated last month (June 29, 2012), “So the law that the Supreme Court upheld is an act of human decency that is also fiscally responsible.  It’s not perfect, by a long shot – it is, after all, originally a Republican plan, devised long ago as a way to forestall the obvious alternatives of extending Medicare to  everyone…And there will be a long struggle to make it better, just as there was for Social Security…But it’s still a big step toward a better – and by that I mean morally better – society.”

Despite the rapidly broadening positive opinion of the morality of the Affordable Care Act, there continues to be acts on the part of legislators to do in its provisions.  Less than two weeks ago, Republicans in the House of Representatives voted to repeal the Act.  That is the 33rd such vote against ensuring that residents of the richest nation on earth would have access to affordable health care, that their pre-existing conditions be covered, and that insurance not be subject to cancellation. 

Equally as concerning as those who would repeal the Act are those who would drag their feet on its implementation.  Some who oppose the Act want to wait until the November election to see if the President can be defeated and if Congress can be changed in the Senate to repeal the Act. 

I am urging Governor McDonnell to call a special session of the General Assembly to set up an insurance exchange and to expand Medicaid.  The Commonwealth Institute for Fiscal Analysis found in its study that expansion of Medicaid in Virginia would be a lifesaver for hundreds of thousands of Virginians, a real bargain for the Commonwealth, and a much needed boost to Virginia’s economy.

 According to the Congressional Budget Office, expansion of Medicaid will actually reduce state and local government costs for uncompensated care that is already provided to the uninsured.  The Urban Institute estimates that overall state savings in the areas of uncompensated care would be between $26 and $52 billion from 2014 to 2020.

Already, the Affordable Care Act that is referred to in the political arena as Obamacare has already helped those Virginians who are among the 17 million children nationally with pre-existing conditions who can no longer be denied coverage by insurance, the 6.8 million young adults up to age 26 who have taken advantage of the law to obtain health insurance through their parents’ plan, and the 86 million Americans, including 32 million seniors in Medicare, who have already received free preventative services. 

Now it is time to finish the job in Virginia.  As the New York Times editorial expressed it, “For almost all of us stand to benefit from making America a kinder and more decent society.”

the-stix July 27, 2012 at 02:33 pm
I’m all for the “kinder and more decent society” the Federal government (and Ken Plum) is attempting to mandate to the commonwealth. I’m also all for letting the the Federal goverment pay for it .. they can print money and borrow from China which the state can not do. Besides, anything we would need to pay would need come out of other needed state spending on schools, transportation, public safety, etc.
Let Virginia opt-out of the Obamacare Medicaid expansion, which state taxpayers will be on the hook for part of (which was 43% before this new mandate), and let the otherwise eligible uninsured get coverage in the state exchanges also mandated by Obamacare and paid for 100%. Heck, this trifling added cost to the feds is only a drop in the bucket compared to the $2.0 trillion in new debt the full Obamacare will cost our children over the next two decades anyway.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Reston Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Molly O'Boyle June 18, 2013 at 07:24 am
The photo is not bronze Bob, Karen! I like the new look though! ! Thanks.
Karen Goff (Editor) June 18, 2013 at 08:00 am
Oops. Sorry I changed the photo. Now I should change the article to match.
Cynde Jackson Clarke June 18, 2013 at 05:39 pm
Looks fabulous!!
Jackie Link June 18, 2013 at 10:17 am
Way to go everyone - Awesome job! Congratulations!!
Eric Cooksey June 18, 2013 at 08:16 pm
What an exciting weekend of softball culminating into a great championship win! So proud of ourRead More Glory ladies!
Kathy Fries June 19, 2013 at 06:19 am
A fun Father's Day Tournament that displayed our girls' softball skills :) Great start to the 2013Read More summer season - Way to go ladies & coaches!
Joe C. June 14, 2013 at 07:03 pm
Molly-you have hit it on the head! We shouldn't be starting down this slippery slope of ruleRead More changing for 1 person.I do not know this individual , but that is not the issue here.
Dilip Kamat June 17, 2013 at 01:51 am
If the RA Board approves this self serving move by another RA Board member then the board membersRead More who do so should be voted out of their roles the next time they run for election.
Mike M June 18, 2013 at 02:41 pm
Mr. Farrell, methinks thou protest too much. What ridicule and derision? It seems that you areRead More fanning the flames and rooting out some sort of scandal that, from my view, doesn't exist. As I understand it, there is a by-law provision that allows a homeowner to ask to be included in the RA. This wasn't something made up to accommodate one person. It was adopted for any single homeowner or cluster to opt in. There is no slippery slope. The rule is not being changed or adjusted for one person. The rule or by-law was in place prior to any of this hand wringing. Next, Ms. Rostant and all the other RA Board members are serving on a volunteer basis. Do any of you critics see some sort of gain to be had in this case? I find the witch hunt nature of some regarding this matter to be dubious if not mean spirited. Its easy to sit back in your easy chair and type away on your computer and deliver your edicts to resign. Get the facts. The lack of civility in some of these posts is repulsive.