- Local every day in
RCA: Forecast Overestimates Toll Revenue
Reston group wants additional study done before Silver Line Phase 2 gets going.
The Reston Citizens Association says that a recent forecast of traffic and revenue from the Dulles Toll Road contains "many very large errors" and wants an additional study be untertaken before there are any more decisions made on moving forward with Phase 2 of the Metro Silver Line.
“Our analysis of a number of Wilbur Smith Associate’s forecasts for toll facilities indicates they frequently overestimate the toll revenues,” said Colin Mills, President of the Reston Citizens Associations (RCA) Board of Directors.
“These overestimates have led to major financial restructurings and even toll road bankruptcies in the cases we looked at, resulting in major losses to investors and bondholders as well as often requiring new public funding and higher tolls.”
RCA sent its study on Friday to Gov. Bob McDonnell, Fairfax County Board of Supervisors Chair Sharon Bulova, Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority Board Chair Michael Curto and other stakeholders in Phase 2.
The study was finished as Wilbur Smith Associates (WSA) is about to complete its third traffic and revenue forecast for the Dulles Toll Road and the funding partners for the Silver Line are preparing to approve a decision to move forward with Phase 2 of the line’s construction.
The 81-page analysis, titled Wilbur Smith Associates’ Traffic and Revenue Forecasts: Plenty of Room for Error, examines the “optimism bias”—overestimating traffic and revenues—in toll road forecasts.
Data from a national study of toll road overestimates indicates WSA’s forecasts averaged a 127 percent overestimate of revenues—more than double—for the first five years for 12 projects it supported. Other forecasting groups performed nearly as poorly, but WSA’s forecasts did not improve over that time span while the others improved markedly.
The RCA assessment notes that WSA’s work in its two studies of the Dulles Toll Road so far (2005 and 2009) show overestimates as well. Its 2005 forecast put the revenue maximizing toll at $2; its 2009 study called for tolls to reach $11.25. It used the highest available population and employment forecasts in both forecasts, overestimating 2010 Fairfax employment by 25 percent in 2005 and 52 percent in 2009.
The pattern of overestimates in WSA’s forecasts suggests a substantial risk in proceeding with the Metrorail line’s current financial plan. Among the risks:
- Lenders will not fund the $3 billion needed to finance Dulles Toll Road construction, or will require state guarantees or funding for an investment grade rating.
- Tolls may double those forecast by WSA to meet debt servicing requirements, compensate for the revenue overestimate, pay higher interest rates, and offset reduced traffic demand.
- Much higher toll rates on the Dulles Toll Road will discourage economic growth along the Dulles Corridor and force a substantial flow of traffic to already congested nearby highways and roads.
- MWAA may have to use airport revenues to pay Dulles Toll Road debt servicing obligations.
- MWAA may face default or restructuring of its Dulles Toll Road debt at a greater debt servicing—and greater toll— expense over a long period of time.
RCA also calls for MWAA to release the upcoming traffic and revenue study as soon as possible, and for all the funding partners to engage the public in a dialogue on whether and how to proceed with Phase 2 under the current financial plan. Longer term, it calls on FHWA to oversee a process that would lead to a substantial improvement in traffic and revenue forecasts.
“RCA has long been enthusiastic about Metrorail to Dulles via Reston,” said Terry Maynard, the report’s principal drafter, said in a statement. “But we do not want a rail line at any price, especially one that forces Dulles Toll Road users to absorb most of the financial burden and area communities to absorb added traffic on already crowded local roads. The prospects are even worse if the WSA forecasts overestimate revenues as much as our research suggests."
The entire report can be found here: RCA Study--Wilbur Smith Traffic & Revenue Forecasts--012712
Dear Honorable Lady and Gentlemen,The Reston Citizens Association (RCA) is pleased to provide you the attached analysis of the traffic and revenue (T&R) forecasts of Wilbur Smith Associates, Inc. (WSA), now known as CDMSmith, approved by the RCA Board on January 23, 2012. Our examination indicates that WSA has made many very large errors in its forecasts that have been costly to investors, bondholders, governments, and toll road users who have relied on them to approve construction of major toll road projects.As our recommendations propose, we believe that it is imperative that a second, independent T&R forecast be completed by another forecasting group before any decision is made to move forward with the construction of Phase 2 of the Silver Line. We recommend that the Virginia Department of Transportation take on that task given its expertise and the intention of the Commonwealth to provide $150 million of state tax revenues to help finance Phase 2 Silver Line construction. At the same time, we call upon the “funding partners”—MWAA and Fairfax and Loudoun counties— to defer any decision to proceed with Phase 2 until that independent analysis has been completed and substantive differences between the two studies resolved. We also ask that they make the upcoming WSA T&R forecast and the Virginia-sponsored study available to the public as soon as possible, and engage the public in discussion about the merits and means of proceeding before any decision is made.Finally, we believe the federal government, specifically the Federal Highway Administration, has a longer term obligation to develop through an open and inclusive process a set of “best practices” for T&R forecasting that will set regulatory standards fort federal funding—grants, loans, and guarantees—of toll road and other road infrastructure projects.
RESTON CITIZENS ASSOCATION STUDY SHOWS MASSIVE OVERESTIMATES IN WILBUR SMITH FORECASTS UNDERMINE FINANCIAL VIABILITY OF TOLL ROADS; CALLS FOR INDEPENDENT FORECAST BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH PHASE 2 OF THE METRORAIL SILVER LINE.
Diane Blust
7:11 am on Saturday, January 28, 2012
Thanks to RCA, and especially Terry Maynard, for this important study. We cannot afford to proceed with this significant infrastructure project without reliable traffic and revenue data. We support RCA's call for an independent forecast before proceeding with phase 2 of the Silver Line.
Diane Blust
President, Fairfax Coalition for Smarter Growth
Sustainable Reston
Bob Bruhns
7:18 pm on Saturday, January 28, 2012
The false premises of Dulles Rail Phase II can no longer be ignored. What should it really cost? It helps to look at comparable jobs.
Comparison 1: The Franconia-Springfield Metro Extension.
Dulles Rail Phase II is about five times the size of the Franconia-Springfield Metro job.
Franconia-Springfield: 3.3 miles of track and a station - $175 million in 1997.
Dulles Rail Phase II: 11.6 miles of track and six stations - over $3 billion in 2012.
Five times $175 million is $875 million. But the actual cost of Dulles Rail Phase II is over $3 billion. That's about 3.5 times the proportional cost of the Springfield Metro, probably even more. But for argument's sake, I will say 3.5 to 1.
Inflation can not be blamed for this 3.5 to 1 bloat.
Comparison 2: The Fairfield, Connecticut Metro Station.
Dulles Rail Phase II metro stations cost two times what metro stations cost in other areas.
Fairfield, Connecticut: Metro Station cost: $43.7 million.
Dulles Rail Rt 28 station cost: $83 million.
Millions more needed to finish Fairfield Metro station.
http://www.ctpost.com/?news/article/?Millions-more-needed-to-fin?ish-Fairfield-Metro-144323?5.php
Fairfield Metro Station Opens.
http://www.mta.info/mnr/?html/fairfield_metro.htm
Dulles Rail Phase II costs way too much. This overcost issue must be addressed now, so that we do not charge ridiculous tolls, and overtax our residents, for generations.
The BSD Guy
2:27 pm on Sunday, January 29, 2012
C'mon guys!!! What about all of the county's precious members of the development community that came up with the original scams ... errrr .... I mean studies, that showed that land development, over development, and sales were INFINITE!!!!! They have plans to build and sell billions in real estate, even if there isn't a need. Just because their shining star of development (that sits at the corner of Sunrise Valley and Hunter Mill )has SAT THERE EMPTY FOR 10 YEARS WITHOUT A TENANT IN SITE, just because about 50% of the office buildings in the area remain marginally occupied IF OCCUPIED AT ALL, doesn't mean we're over developed.
Sarcasm aside, it might be worth the effort of SOMEBODY in the state government to evaluate how all the overdevelopment induced bankruptcies that have occurred in the last 10-20 years have effected the state budget. Who gets stuck footing the bill? For example, the huge buillding that's in the vicinity of Sunrise Valley/Van Buren/Monroe streets went bankrupt after it sat there empty for about 8 years. Now it's FINALLY partially leased out, but the owners folded. The county (and possibly state) had to fund fairly significant road work to accommodate the unneeded monstrosity. WHO gets stuck footing the bill for all this?
Independent studies of rail NEED to be done, and they NEED to be done as far away from N. Va's developer controlled political machine as possible .... before they finally drive the area into complete bankruptcy!